I need to vent....
|
12-04-2014, 08:25 PM
Post: #1328
|
|||
|
|||
RE: I need to vent....
(12-04-2014 04:43 PM)Decagon Wrote: The available scientific explanations are very relevant in the process of understanding NDEs, but they still remain hypotheses, given the persistent lack of proofs. OH... MY... FUCKING... GOD. Are you really, REALLY, so fucking STUPID? Really? How about you bold ALL the relevant parts of that section, nimrod! Quote:The available scientific explanations are very relevant in the Seriously moron, answer me this, what do you think is being referred to with the phrase "scientific explanations"? Are you REALLY this fucking stupid? Did you just do a search on the article, see the phrase "lack of proofs" and then copy-and-paste with no further thought? The entire point of this article, which you of course MISSED because you DIDN'T READ IT, is that the current "scientific" explanations for near-death experiences fail to adequately explain just what is going on with patients reporting having seen bright lights, tunnels, conversing with the spirits of lost family members, etc... This statement, by its very nature, addresses your concern of post-death consciousness somehow being a memory created by the brain after the fact. How about you actually READ the fucking article that you were begging for, you fucking piece of shit. And don't come back up in here with your lame-ass ranting and raving until you do. For BU's resident asshole: Quote:STE12. Near-Death Experiences: Relevance to the Question of Survival after Death by Dr. Ian Stevenson and Dr. Bruce Greyson. (Journal of the American Medical Association. 242:265-267, 1979). A brief review of some published studies of near-death experiences and a discussion of the importance of studying such cases. (pdf) Here's a couple of more articles on the subject for you in peer-reviewed journals, asswipe. Happy reading. Warriors Don't Show Their Heart Until The Axe Reveals It. |
|||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)