Things not thread worthy

[and the NEW]

(06-01-2017 06:57 PM)JONdaCON Wrote:  Im high on all 3... I like Thurman the most. His style looks good to me.. he's more of a boxer puncher then EJ, as i think Errol is a pressure fighter at heart... Crawford is probably the better boxer of the 3 but he's too little imo. He'd have to walk around at like 175lbs.. Bud maybe gets up to 150 between fights. He's skinnnnnnny.

Yeah, Bud is super skinny hey, especially for a guy that isn't that tall for his weight in boxing. What surprises me though is how strong he is. I reckon his looks must be very deceptive, he must be dense as hell in those muscles, tendons and bones!

---

(06-01-2017 01:22 PM)KingEugene Wrote:  I like Spence but he's not beating Thurman, Crawford isn't either although I'd give him the biggest shot. Yea Thurman has a lot of holes but his movement and speed will give Spence problems. Crawford would adjust better to me. Spence only adjustment is more pressure.

Looks like I'm the only one here taking EJ or Crawford over Thurman!