|
Politics Unfiltered
|
|
11-26-2012, 06:27 PM
Post: #491
|
|||
|
|||
|
Politics Unfiltered
What is it with republicans and stupid names? "Mitt" "Newt" "Rush"
|
|||
|
|
11-26-2012, 07:57 PM
Post: #492
|
|||
|
|||
|
Politics Unfiltered
The new "it" thing is to give your child a unique name. Those aren't that bad when you consider what celebrities name their kids. But because you brought it up...
  
"And you got your own steez about you that I appreciate bro. I see it." - Snoop |
|||
|
|
11-26-2012, 11:41 PM
Post: #493
|
|||
|
|||
Politics Unfiltered
lloyd mayflower Wrote:What is it with republicans and stupid names? "Mitt" "Newt" "Rush"What about Barack Obama? |
|||
|
|
|
11-26-2012, 11:51 PM
Post: #494
|
|||
|
|||
| Politics Unfiltered | |||
|
|
|
11-27-2012, 02:24 AM
Post: #495
|
|||
|
|||
Politics Unfiltered
BrotherCane Wrote:Damn! It really has turned into a team game over there!lloyd mayflower Wrote:What is it with republicans and stupid names? "Mitt" "Newt" "Rush"What about Barack Obama? At least Obama has the look to back up his name! That could be like someone being called John Wilson in kenya for all we know! |
|||
|
|
|
11-27-2012, 03:41 AM
Post: #496
|
|||
|
|||
Politics Unfiltered
lloyd mayflower Wrote:It's fucking silly. And now the establishment Republicans are moving left in their positions in response to the election. lolBrotherCane Wrote:Damn! It really has turned into a team game over there!lloyd mayflower Wrote:What is it with republicans and stupid names? "Mitt" "Newt" "Rush"What about Barack Obama? I will continue to state the obvious...THE FIRST PARTY TO DROP SOCIAL ISSUES FROM ITS OFFICIAL PLATFORM WILL RULE FOREVER. "And you got your own steez about you that I appreciate bro. I see it." - Snoop |
|||
|
|
|
11-27-2012, 03:40 PM
Post: #497
|
|||
|
|||
|
Politics Unfiltered
Rand Paul is 100% on point I think! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RcuNe-P9e-I
http://www.youtube.com/v/RcuNe-P9e-I |
|||
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 12:32 PM
Post: #498
|
|||
|
|||
|
Politics Unfiltered
Fiscal Cliff - what a load of crap.
My taxes are going up under any scenario, and that is what the election was about. What if we did go off this supposed Fiscal Cliff? 1. All of your taxes will go up substantially. 2. There will be substantial budget cuts across the board. That sounds like a compromise of sorts to me. From a business perspective, I would prefer that those making less than $300,000 not endure a tax increase beyond an increase in the Social Security Cap, and that a decent safety net be maintained. There is plenty of pork to be sliced, including (and especially) in the DOD. Privatization of military support services has been a fiscal disaster that has furthered the corporate fascist movement. To that end, Goldman Sachs executives should be investigated, prosecuted, and (in a perfect world) hung for their attempt to institute global corporatism, as an example. A Constitutional amendment should be passed to eliminate the effects of the Citizens United decision. In the meantime, I will pay my higher tax rate and fight on. |
|||
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 12:50 PM
Post: #499
|
|||
|
|||
|
Politics Unfiltered
I just wish that our elected officials would have our best interests in mind rather than those of their donors.
Term limits is a good start to fixing that practice. "And you got your own steez about you that I appreciate bro. I see it." - Snoop |
|||
|
|
|
11-28-2012, 01:00 PM
Post: #500
|
|||
|
|||
|
Politics Unfiltered
I think it should be @ least $500k or a million! $82.2 billion in tax hikes ain't gonna do shit when our medicare and SS alone in the next 2 years is $82 trillion! Liberal policies have kill us!
|
|||
|
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
User(s) browsing this thread: 5 Guest(s)