Politics Unfiltered

[Spyder]

BGv4.0 Wrote:To me the bottom line in any sort of gun control issue is saving human life. IMHO, it's at the very least worth a simple social experiment to see IF it has a major effect on lives being saved. Would the two hard-core trigger licking gun lovers on this thread at the very least agree to such a social experiment that after a set number of years could be retracted if proven that it had no impact?

There has already been a number of those little "experiments", specifically in Washington DC and Chicago....both saw a slight immediate drop in events, and then a steep increase.




You can't be more willing to win a discussion than to realize the truth. Banning guns is not the solution.

[BrotherCane]

Spyder Wrote:

BGv4.0 Wrote:To me the bottom line in any sort of gun control issue is saving human life. IMHO, it's at the very least worth a simple social experiment to see IF it has a major effect on lives being saved. Would the two hard-core trigger licking gun lovers on this thread at the very least agree to such a social experiment that after a set number of years could be retracted if proven that it had no impact?

There has already been a number of those little "experiments", specifically in Washington DC and Chicago....both saw a slight immediate drop in events, and then a steep increase.




You can't be more willing to win a discussion than to realize the truth. Banning guns is not the solution.

I don't think a few in here will ever change their even with facts and stats! And BGv we already tried it...the only answer to fix it is something that shouldn't be typed cause it involves killing people! Face it, Obama the tyrant and the rest of tyrants are the best gun salesmen in the history of man!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!

[lloyd mayflower]

BrotherCane Wrote:

Spyder Wrote:

BGv4.0 Wrote:To me the bottom line in any sort of gun control issue is saving human life. IMHO, it's at the very least worth a simple social experiment to see IF it has a major effect on lives being saved. Would the two hard-core trigger licking gun lovers on this thread at the very least agree to such a social experiment that after a set number of years could be retracted if proven that it had no impact?

There has already been a number of those little "experiments", specifically in Washington DC and Chicago....both saw a slight immediate drop in events, and then a steep increase.




You can't be more willing to win a discussion than to realize the truth. Banning guns is not the solution.

I don't think a few in here will ever change their even with facts and stats! And BGv we already tried it...the only answer to fix it is something that shouldn't be typed cause it involves killing people! Face it, Obama the tyrant and the rest of tyrants are the best gun salesmen in the history of man!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!

I hope none of us on this board ever has to live under a tyrant. You certainly dont

[BrotherCane]

lloyd mayflower Wrote:

BrotherCane Wrote:

Spyder Wrote:

BGv4.0 Wrote:To me the bottom line in any sort of gun control issue is saving human life. IMHO, it's at the very least worth a simple social experiment to see IF it has a major effect on lives being saved. Would the two hard-core trigger licking gun lovers on this thread at the very least agree to such a social experiment that after a set number of years could be retracted if proven that it had no impact?

There has already been a number of those little "experiments", specifically in Washington DC and Chicago....both saw a slight immediate drop in events, and then a steep increase.




You can't be more willing to win a discussion than to realize the truth. Banning guns is not the solution.

I don't think a few in here will ever change their even with facts and stats! And BGv we already tried it...the only answer to fix it is something that shouldn't be typed cause it involves killing people! Face it, Obama the tyrant and the rest of tyrants are the best gun salesmen in the history of man!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!

I hope none of us on this board ever has to live under a tyrant. You certainly dont

They sure wanna be, see when people want more government, they give up liberties and the left don't get that...not that the current right is much better. Fools actually believe the government will make healthcare cheaper, they worry about abortion(their bodies) and then give the
government more power to do anything else they want? It's amazing to me! 77000 new laws and regulations have went on the books this year already, we are losing control of the outta control government...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tyrant
1. a person who governs oppressively, unjustly, and arbitrarily; despot
2. any person who exercises authority in a tyrannical manner
3. anything that exercises tyrannical influence
4. (esp in ancient Greece) a ruler whose authority lacked the sanction of law or custom; usurper

[C13: from Old French tyrant, from Latin tyrannus, from Greek turannos ]

[Spyder]

BrotherCane Wrote:

lloyd mayflower Wrote:

BrotherCane Wrote:

Spyder Wrote:

BGv4.0 Wrote:To me the bottom line in any sort of gun control issue is saving human life. IMHO, it's at the very least worth a simple social experiment to see IF it has a major effect on lives being saved. Would the two hard-core trigger licking gun lovers on this thread at the very least agree to such a social experiment that after a set number of years could be retracted if proven that it had no impact?

There has already been a number of those little "experiments", specifically in Washington DC and Chicago....both saw a slight immediate drop in events, and then a steep increase.




You can't be more willing to win a discussion than to realize the truth. Banning guns is not the solution.

I don't think a few in here will ever change their even with facts and stats! And BGv we already tried it...the only answer to fix it is something that shouldn't be typed cause it involves killing people! Face it, Obama the tyrant and the rest of tyrants are the best gun salesmen in the history of man!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!

I hope none of us on this board ever has to live under a tyrant. You certainly dont

They sure wanna be, see when people want more government, they give up liberties and the left don't get that...not that the current right is much better. Fools actually believe the government will make healthcare cheaper, they worry about abortion(their bodies) and then give the government to do anything else they want? It's amazing to me! 77000 new laws and regulations have went on the books this year already, we are losing control of the outta control government...

It's no coincidence that people in support of a bigger government are also in support of increased gun control.

[Maxy]

BrotherCane Wrote:

lloyd mayflower Wrote:

BrotherCane Wrote:

Spyder Wrote:

BGv4.0 Wrote:To me the bottom line in any sort of gun control issue is saving human life. IMHO, it's at the very least worth a simple social experiment to see IF it has a major effect on lives being saved. Would the two hard-core trigger licking gun lovers on this thread at the very least agree to such a social experiment that after a set number of years could be retracted if proven that it had no impact?

There has already been a number of those little "experiments", specifically in Washington DC and Chicago....both saw a slight immediate drop in events, and then a steep increase.




You can't be more willing to win a discussion than to realize the truth. Banning guns is not the solution.

I don't think a few in here will ever change their even with facts and stats! And BGv we already tried it...the only answer to fix it is something that shouldn't be typed cause it involves killing people! Face it, Obama the tyrant and the rest of tyrants are the best gun salesmen in the history of man!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pla...AEPx8vlg#!

I hope none of us on this board ever has to live under a tyrant. You certainly dont

They sure wanna be, see when people want more government, they give up liberties and the left don't get that...not that the current right is much better. Fools actually believe the government will make healthcare cheaper, they worry about abortion(their bodies) and then give the
government more power to do anything else they want? It's amazing to me! 77000 new laws and regulations have went on the books this year already, we are losing control of the outta control government...

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/tyrant
1. a person who governs oppressively, unjustly, and arbitrarily; despot
2. any person who exercises authority in a tyrannical manner
3. anything that exercises tyrannical influence
4. (esp in ancient Greece) a ruler whose authority lacked the sanction of law or custom; usurper

[C13: from Old French tyrant, from Latin tyrannus, from Greek turannos ]

Come off it man, you're being stupendously ridiculous with this tyrant talk to the point where you really cannot be taken seriously in anything you say.

[BrotherCane]

That's fine if you feel that way but NDAA, EO 13603 and an unlimited debt ceiling to continue destroying the country all sounds like tyranny to me. Even if it's probably the banks and lobbyist behind the scents but all have the same affect. I understand it's a bit of a stretch but when you bailout banks, get support from George freaking Soros...true in your face tyranny isn't so far away and either is the NWO.

I mean in many ways, welfare can be oppressive as it makes them dependent...not that some don't need it and that is fine. But when our government is choking out the private sector to grow the public sector and since June, 73% of all jobs are government jobs, what do you call it? It sounds pretty oppressive to me!

[Maxy]

BrotherCane Wrote:That's fine if you feel that way but NDAA, EO 13603 and an unlimited debt ceiling to continue destroying the country all sounds like tyranny to me. Even if it's probably the banks and lobbyist behind the scents but all have the same affect. I understand it's a bit of a stretch but when you bailout banks, get support from George freaking Soros...true in your face tyranny isn't so far away and either is the NWO.

I mean in many ways, welfare can be oppressive as it makes them dependent...not that some don't need it and that is fine. But when our government is choking out the private sector to grow the public sector and since June, 73% of all jobs are government jobs, what do you call it? It sounds pretty oppressive to me!

Are you a fan of Alex Jones?

[BrotherCane]

Maxy Wrote:

BrotherCane Wrote:That's fine if you feel that way but NDAA, EO 13603 and an unlimited debt ceiling to continue destroying the country all sounds like tyranny to me. Even if it's probably the banks and lobbyist behind the scents but all have the same affect. I understand it's a bit of a stretch but when you bailout banks, get support from George freaking Soros...true in your face tyranny isn't so far away and either is the NWO.

I mean in many ways, welfare can be oppressive as it makes them dependent...not that some don't need it and that is fine. But when our government is choking out the private sector to grow the public sector and since June, 73% of all jobs are government jobs, what do you call it? It sounds pretty oppressive to me!

Are you a fan of Alex Jones?

He gets a hair carried away but can't dismiss all of his stuff. He reported UN troops are on US soil and there is...he reported there are FEMA reeducation camps and there are. He reported that FEMA ordered thousands of plastic coffins and there are so it's not like he is worthless so now answer my question!

[BrotherCane]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KRSDwcYtNg
http://www.youtube.com/v/5KRSDwcYtNg