Politics Unfiltered

[Warlord]

(10-08-2014 10:42 AM)Decagon Wrote:  

(10-08-2014 08:00 AM)Warlord Wrote:  Or address the points that atheist and professional historians with published works (I mean actual books, not dickhead bloggers with agendas like the one you provided) have made?

Actually, The Raw Story cited David Fitzgerald's published work, but you obviously didn't read the article.

You're so weak. The only thing ever released by David Fitzgerald was a self-published book that was deconstructed by actual historians, specifically the two that I listed in a previous post. These historians also happen to be atheists, so don't waste your breath claiming they have some sort of an agenda.

If you had read either of the links I provided, or watched the video, then you would have known that I listed them specifically because they debunk the blog link you provided, as well as the book that the article was based on (your self-published messiah David Fitzgerald.)

And unlike the self-published author you cited, Bart Ehrman (one of the authors I cited) has had over 25 books published (including three college textbooks), five of which were New York Times bestsellers. To continue the dick measuring contest, David Fitzgerald has failed even to win support from his fellow atheists, whereas Bart Ehrman's books have received international critical acclaim, having been translated into 27 languages and counting.

To finish this part of my reply up, it's beyond ignorant for you to claim that I didn't read the article you provided, when I broke it down, point by fucking point. Here's the link in case you missed it, retard. It's post #316: http://boxingunfiltered.com/forum/showth...15&page=32

This embarrassing display of ignorance by you leads me to the same question I've had from the beginning, which is do you even fucking read when people respond to you? Or do you just continue to shit out your same old bullshit over and over, regardless of how stupid it is?

Either take some fucking Ritalin and hunker down and read your opponent's response, or shut the fuck up and don't pretend like you have the intelligence to enter into civil discourse with adults.


Cliff-notes version for the one retard who will have failed to read the above post:

Decagon posts link from rawstory.com, featuring article written by Valerie Tarico, based on the self-published book by delusional atheist David Fitzgerald. Tarico of course is completely unbiased in her writing, having written such masterpiece blogs as: 9 truly evil things right-wing Christians do, Why So Much Religion Is Oppressive, Merry Atheist Christmas! How the 'Atheist Church' Will Celebrate the Holidays, Does the Bible Sanction Child Abuse?, and more! (Find them all here: http://www.alternet.org/authors/valerie-tarico)


Warlord posts point-by-point rebuttal of said article (found here: http://boxingunfiltered.com/forum/showth...5&page=32) and also provides links from legitimate historians (who also happen to be atheists) that rebut the self-published drivel provided by resident retard Decagon. These links include:





http://www.strangenotions.com/an-atheist...rt-1-of-2/

http://www.strangenotions.com/an-atheist...rt-2-of-2/

http://armariummagnus.blogspot.com/2011/...-show.html


Decagon, as always, fails to read any of the responses given him, and continues to ask, "Why don't you respond to my post, idiot?"


Warlord, also as always, would like to kindly remind our resident moron to find a way to get the child-proof lid off his bottle of Ritalin, pop a few of those bad boys, and get to work actually reading the responses he is seemingly so desperate for.