Coronavirus

[Warlord]

(09-25-2020 02:22 PM)Snoop Wrote:  There were people in the CHAZ with machine guns and the one picture depicting that is correct. What's wrong with the collage is that two of the pictures included in the collage are not from the CHAZ and should therefore not be in a report about the CHAZ. I'm not sure why that's so hard to understand.


My argument about "both sides" is about media depiction, not about who is responsible for things like the CHAZ happening. You are confusing the two.


The photos that are used with news reports do contribute to the accuracy of reporting. If they didn't, why else would photographs need to be pulled and amendments need to be made?


I dunno. Maybe in the headline that says, "Seattle helpless as armed guards patrol anarchists' 'autonomous zone', shake down businesses: cops"?

You really think that pulling a photo from a certain time and place, and sticking it behind a headline about a completely different time and place, serves solely to "illustrate a point" and that readers will not think the photo is from the place being reported on? I mean, are you fucking serious? If there's anyone here trying to justify biased reporting, it's you.


What is the point of bringing this up? I don't disagree with you that liberal media outlets produce garbage news reports too.


No it's not. Just because one side is wrong doesn't absolve the other side from wrongdoing. It's idiotic to think that it does.

You're also creating an argument that I am not making. My issue is with the standards of reporting with Fox News. I never said that it contributed to the chaos that ensued at the CHAZ. That is a leap of logic that you made on your own.


Again, I never said Fox News contributed to the CHAZ being a disaster. My original point is that their misreporting made it seem worse than it actually was (i.e. there were no buildings on fire at the time of that report), but that liberal media made is seem safer than it actually was, and that the overall creation and existence of CHAZ was f'n dumb because it resulted in deaths that could have been prevented.

If you wanna argue that Fox News wasn't misreporting, fine. But that's not what you're saying. You're getting teed off because you think I'm saying the right and right-leaning media is partially responsible for the riots and things like the CHAZ, and I haven't said anything of the sort. If it's not clear that I think the CHAZ was purely inspired by the left, well, I'm saying it now.


You changed the "comma" to a "period" of my initial statement. It's a slight alteration, but enough to show you made a deliberate effort to change what I was saying, because this statement:


Reads much differently than this statement:


It's called "quoting out of context".


I do know what I said and I haven't denied any of it. What I am denying is your conjecture of what I said because you're twisting my words so that you can spew your hatred for the left onto me. I mean sure, I get it. The country is in crisis and the idiotic garbage arguments being made on the left isn't helping, but I'm also not the guy who is making them.

I love you, man, but you're acting like a Grade A fucktard here.

You claim the CHAZ wasn't as bad as Fox News "reported", and your evidence of this is that they included a picture of a man with a machine gun in a picture collage that wasn't really a picture of the actual man in the CHAZ... or the actual machine gun he was armed with.

And I "altered" the entire meaning of your post by using a period instead of a comma.

Good lord, I thought you were better than this. This is Decagon level stupidity right here.